Engineering portfolio · director edition · chief-engineer edition

Nir Herscovici

Head of Manufacturing Technology, Precision Castparts Corp. (Berkshire Hathaway), 2020–2026. He built and ran the function that put machine perception and closed-loop control into 24/7 production at eight or more aerospace-metals plants.

With the company 2014–2026 · M.S. and B.S. Mechanical Engineering, B.S. Computer Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas · Co-inventor on four patent filings, one granted

  • 30%+less scrap and defects across the plants running his systems
  • 25%+fewer recordable incidents
  • 10%+higher uptime and throughput
  • 8+plants on one platform: 200+ sensors, 15+ systems, zero production downtime
  • 22person R&D organization built and led for six years
RolesHead of Manufacturing Technology and Principal Engineer, R&DSenior Manufacturing Process Technology EngineerResearch and Data Analytics Engineer, R&DManufacturing Process Technology Engineer, R&D2014201620182020202220242026MilestonesVision program starts,Univ. of BirminghamFirst in-houseend-of-run visionNeural-networkdevelopment beginsHead of a 22-personR&D organizationProvisional patent,power cutbackLMPC Best PaperAward$500M greenfieldplant breaks groundLMPC Most InnovativeWork AwardU.S. patent granted;two more publishedWeld patent filed;conference paper
  1. 2014Manufacturing Process Technology Engineer, R&D. Vision program started with the University of Birmingham
  2. 2015Research and Data Analytics Engineer, R&D
  3. 2016First in-house end-of-melt vision system
  4. 2017Senior Manufacturing Process Technology Engineer
  5. 2018Neural-network development begins
  6. 2020Head of Manufacturing Technology and Principal Engineer, R&D: a 22-person R&D organization
  7. 2021Provisional patent, power cutback
  8. 2022LMPC Best Paper Award
  9. 2023$500M greenfield plant breaks ground
  10. 2024LMPC Most Innovative Work Award
  11. 2025U.S. patent granted; two applications published
  12. 2026Weld-rating patent filed; conference paper
Career progression at Precision Castparts, 2014–2026.

Part 1 · Leadership

Leadership

Herscovici ran manufacturing technology for melting, forging and inspection across the company's titanium plants: a 22-person R&D organization, a seven-figure budget, the company's de facto head of machine learning, and the technology standard that every site builds to. He presented roadmaps directly to the COO, won CEO approval to expand the organization, and was the company's technical face to nine jet-engine OEMs through a material-defect investigation.

Scope

Perception and control for melting, forging and inspection at 8+ plants in the U.S. and UK. 15+ systems in 24/7 production, 200+ sensors on 30 GPU servers, zero production downtime through every rollout.

People

10 engineers, 5 graduate researchers, 7 technicians. Hired four engineers directly, recruited three internally, advised all five researchers. Every engineer earned a significant promotion; one technician is now a superintendent; 85% of 15 interns became full-time engineers.

Money

Seven-figure R&D budget. Seven-figure capital requests approved on business cases with payback targets typically under 12 months. $2M+ of new OEM and cross-division funded work. Owner of the $5M+ technology package at a $500M greenfield plant.

Stakeholders

COO (roadmaps and schedules), CEO (organization expansion), OEM executives and specialists (weekly during the investigation), three engineering contractors and the equipment OEM (greenfield build), plant IT (policy standards), a DARPA consortium with four OEMs.

Results

  • Cut scrap and defects 30%+, raised uptime and throughput 10%+ and cut recordable incidents 25%+ across the plants running these systems, by taking 15+ perception and control systems into 24/7 production on one standard platform.
  • Delivered the technology package of a $500M greenfield titanium plant, measured by seven process units instrumented from site inception and milestones met, by serving as de facto chief engineer for all site technology and owning the $5M+ package, the contractors, the equipment OEM and the schedule.
  • Resolved a first-of-its-kind material-defect investigation for nine jet-engine OEMs, measured by 1,132 production runs reviewed and the defect resolved, by directing 50+ people across sites as customer-facing technical lead and cutting the projected review cost about 80%.
  • Set the company's standard for future sites, measured by adoption of the reference architecture, hardware and vendor standards, rollout playbook and maintenance procedures, by proving the platform at existing plants and writing it into the framework.
  • Built the organization that maintains all of it, measured by promotions for every engineer and an internship structure adopted company-wide, by hiring, recruiting and advising directly for six years.
  • Turned the function's work into protected IP, measured by four patent filings (US 12,332,611 B2 granted; US 2025/0119992 A1 and US 2025/0277286 A1 published; one application and one provisional pending) and two conference awards, by taking each system from R&D prototype to production before filing.

Business impact

OutcomeChangeWhere it comes fromScrap and defects−30%+fewer scrapped runs and less reworkRecordable incidents−25%+manual hazardous tasks removed, earlier hazard detectionSite-wide savings10%+ sharedelivered by the function across the plants running these systemsUptime and throughput+10%+zero production downtime through every rolloutProjected review cost−80%one ~950-run customer review, by optimizing the data pipelineEnd-of-run prediction error−85%+closed-loop power control, within four monthsHuman review time−90%closed-loop, human-in-the-loop guidance systemManual video review−99%100× less review: rare-event detector with trackingRanges stated at their floor.
FIG. 1Where the money is. Scrap, rework and incidents are the direct savings; review time and prediction error are the engineering hours and quality variance behind them. The function delivered 10%+ of site-wide savings across the plants running these systems, on business cases with payback targets typically under 12 months.

Operating model

  • A business case before capital. ROI, trade studies and a payback target for every project; stage-gate validation from the pilot line to production.
  • An assurance case before fielding. FMEA and hazard analysis with documented safety cases, model acceptance criteria, calibrated thresholds and runtime monitors; a formal on-call and incident-response process for systems in service.
  • Build for the plant. Standard hardware, in-house code and written maintenance procedures, so plant engineers own what R&D delivers.
  • Grow the team from the inside. Interns to engineers, graduate researchers advised personally, promotions argued for every engineer.
  • A visible cadence. Weekly schedules against plan, weekly customer calls during the investigation, roadmaps and Gantt schedules to executives; lightweight agile practice inside the team.

Title note: PCC has no chief-engineer title. "De facto chief engineer" describes the role he held at the greenfield plant, not a title.

Part 2 · The corporate technology roadmap

Build once, then scale across plants and repurpose across processes

Herscovici set the multi-year technology direction for machine learning, vision, sensing, inspection and automation across the company's plants and processes. The roadmap matured from isolated AI projects into a manufacturing-systems platform, and from one plant's tools into a catalog of capabilities: each one built and hardened on one process, then copied to other plants and repurposed for other processes and divisions. The model is a standard core with a local last mile: the hardware, software and data architecture are shared; mounting, thresholds, operator displays and process logic are site-specific.

SensingDetectionMeasurementDataintegrationControlsStorageand retrievalOperatorworkflowRetrainingand supportDeploymentgovernancewhere an isolated project stopswhat makes it a production system that can be copied and repurposedFrom isolated AI projects to a manufacturing-systems platformstandard core, local last mile: mounting, thresholds, displays and process logic are site-specific; everything else is shared
FIG. 2The roadmap as a chain. Isolated projects stop at measurement; the six links after it are what turn a tool into a production system that can be copied and repurposed.
Before · isolated projectsAfter · a shared core with a local last mileProject 1sensorsoftwarestorageProject 2sensorsoftwarestorageProject 3sensorsoftwarestorage××nothing shared, nothing repeatedmanual supervisionfragile data integrationunderestimated hardwarefragmented ownershipreinvention at every siteShared core · one standardsensingtransportcomputeintegrationgovernancesite 1site 2site 3site 4site nupdates flow down · lessons flow uphatched: the local last mile (mounting, thresholds, displays, process logic)preferred hardware stacksreusable software modulessignal and storage architectureFAT and documentation packagesIT and security templates, named ownership
FIG. 3Isolated projects and the shared core. Left: each project with its own sensor, software and storage, and the five failure modes that followed. Right: one standard core, a hatched local last mile at each site, and the standardization priorities that answered each failure mode.

The same failure modes repeated across facilities: manual supervision, fragile data integration, underestimated hardware complexity, fragmented ownership and reinvention. Each became a standardization priority: preferred hardware stacks, reusable software modules, a signal and storage architecture, documentation and acceptance-test packages, IT and security templates, and named ownership for updates and retraining, so no deployment is engineered from scratch.

Scale: copy to the next plant

Each plant gets the same reference kit: sensing, transport, compute, integration, people and governance, built to one hardware and vendor standard, factory-acceptance-tested before installation, and fielded only after an assurance case (FMEA, safety cases, acceptance criteria, calibrated thresholds, runtime monitors). That is why the platform has run 24/7 at 8+ plants with zero production downtime.

A new site does not get a new design. It gets the reference kit, the same parts, drawings and procedures, and moves through the same four maturity stages. That is how one system on one process unit in 2016 became a company standard at eight or more plants by 2026, with a greenfield plant instrumented from inception. Read-across is a business lever as much as an engineering one: less repeated engineering cost, shorter deployment time, and site teams that trust what arrives because it already runs elsewhere.

One designMany instancesReference designsensingtransportcomputeintegrationgovernanceinstantiatesite 1site 2site 3site 4site nsolid: the shared core, identical everywhere · hatched: the local last milegovernance: updates flow down, lessons flow upGrowth20161 unit20205 units20237 units, greenfield20268+ plants
FIG. 4Scaling as instantiation. One reference design; each site is a copy with a small site-specific slot; governance keeps the copies in step. Red: how the count grew, from one unit in 2016 to eight or more plants in 2026.

Repurpose: the same capability on a different process

The capabilities are not tied to the process they were built on. Rare-event detection trained on one process became defect and side-arcing recognition for a castings division; the measurement stack became bar straightness and cut guidance at a forge press and CT defect detection for castings; process analytics moved to an electron-beam process. Each move reused validated architecture and software patterns, which is what makes the portfolio a corporate asset rather than a set of plant projects.

CapabilityHow far it traveled from where it was builtSame process,more plantsDifferentprocessDifferentdivisionDifferent sensingmodalityRare-event detection and trackingvideo models, tracking, evidence pipelineClosed-loop control from visionalarm, decision support, automatic actionGated measurementa number the controller can act onMeasurement and sensor fusiontwo instruments, one recordElectromagnetic actuation and controlcoils, drives, controller, verification by cameraProcess analytics and safetyquality scoring, hazard zonesdoneon the roadmap, same kitnot applicableblank: not yetA capability that has crossed a column boundary once has a template for crossing it again.
FIG. 5How far each capability traveled from the process it was built on: to more plants, to a different process, to a different division, to a different sensing modality. Filled: done. Rings: on the roadmap with the same kit.

Part 3 · The portfolio

Six of the 15+ production systems

Herscovici wrote production code for every one of these and led the organization that maintains them. The full engineering record, with decisions, sketches, mathematics and limits, is in the chief-engineer edition.

  • Machine perception and rare-event detection

  • 01 Rare-event detection and tracking in production video (image-suitability method: U.S. application pending)Resolved a first-of-its-kind jet-engine material defect for nine OEMs, measured by 95% fewer false positives at 95%+ recall, 100× less manual review and an ~80% lower projected review cost, by designing a three-stage detector with multi-target tracking and a domain-shift monitor, and running the review on a weekly schedule as customer-facing technical lead.
  • Vision systems for dimensional metrology and inspection

  • 02 A measurement that gates a process step: weld rating (provisional patent filed)Replaced a visual weld judgment with a reproducible gate on the run, measured by a 1-to-5 rating in 5–10 seconds, ~85% agreement with an engineer mid-development and a PLC interlock on every failed weld, by building two segmentation networks, a radial-coverage geometry and a fail-closed PLC and MES integration.
  • 03 Multi-sensor fusion on one record: straightness, hot and coldMeasured bar straightness at the forge press in real time, measured by 4K video collected 24/7, hot results benchmarked against the cold laser scanner on the same forged bars and results on the operator's display at the press, by combining semantic segmentation with least-squares edge slopes and fusing both instruments on one MES record.
  • 04 Laser metrology and in-process control (US 2025/0277286 A1)Put inspection on a measured footing, measured by about 80% of final-stage molds at one plant scanned, an LMPC 2024 Most Innovative Work Award and a pending patent on shelf detection, by building a laser-and-camera mold scanner and the in-process measurements that feed arc control.
  • Controls, mechanical design and automation

  • 05 Closed-loop process control from vision (US 12,332,611 B2)Automated end-of-run power cutback in production for 3+ years, measured by 85%+ lower prediction error within four months and U.S. Patent 12,332,611, by replacing a licensed, hard-wired first-generation system with an in-house CNN-plus-regression trigger connected to the process unit at two interface points.
  • 06 Electromagnetic actuation and control (US 2025/0119992 A1)Closed a ~2% product-yield gap between two plants, measured by 19+ cast products at the top surface rating, by designing a twin-coil arc-steering retrofit with three-phase PWM drives, PLC control and camera-based verification of arc rotation.

Patents and papers

Patents are assigned to a Precision Castparts subsidiary. LMPC is the Liquid Metal Processing & Casting Conference, where Herscovici also served on the committee. He spoke and led workshops on machine learning and computer vision at PCC's technical conferences each year.

Background

Roles at Precision Castparts Corp.

  • 2020–2026Head of Manufacturing Technology and Principal Engineer, R&D
  • 2017–2020Senior Manufacturing Process Technology Engineer
  • 2015–2017Research and Data Analytics Engineer, R&D
  • 2014–2015Manufacturing Process Technology Engineer, R&D

Education

M.S. Mechanical Engineering · B.S. Mechanical Engineering · B.S. Computer Science

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Working tools: Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow, OpenCV, scikit-learn, ONNX, TensorRT; Databricks, Spark, MLflow, Azure; Allen-Bradley PLCs over OPC-UA, Ignition HMI, AVEVA MES; SolidWorks, COMSOL, MATLAB and Simulink. C/C++ and CUDA shipped in production earlier in his tenure; recent work is Python.

Notes. Patents, the conference paper and the plant groundbreaking are public record and linked where they appear. Production figures are company records, stated as the floor of any range. Proprietary detail is left out: no site codes, no process recipes, no code. Figures are simplified sketches, not to scale. Contact details are on the CV.